Maruti Suzuki S-Cross 2020 Petrol vs Competition - Price, Specs, Features Comparison
We compare Maruti Suzuki S-Cross against other C-segment SUVs based on prices, engine specs and dimensions to analyse how it holds up against the competition.

Maruti Suzuki SCross Petrol vs Rivals | Price Comparison
Maruti Suzuki S-Cross prices start from Rs. 8.39 lakh (ex-showroom) and it rivals the Hyundai Creta, Kia Seltos and Renault Duster in the segment. The complete price list of the petrol-powered S Cross is as follows:
C-SEGMENT SUV | PETROL MANUAL | PRICE LIST EX-SHOWROOM INDIA | JUL 2020 |
||||
Maruti Suzuki S-Cross |
Nissan Kicks |
Kia Seltos |
Hyundai Creta |
Renault Duster |
Sigma ₹8,39,000 |
- |
- |
- |
RXE ₹8,49,000 |
Delta ₹9,60,000 |
1.5 XL |
- |
- |
RXS ₹9,29,000 |
Zeta ₹9,95,000 |
1.5 XV |
HTE ₹9,89,000 |
EX ₹9,99,000 |
RXZ ₹9,99,000 |
- |
HTK ₹10,29,000 |
- |
- |
|
Alpha ₹11,15,500 |
1.3 XV ₹11,84,990 |
HTK+ ₹11,49,000 |
S ₹11,72,000 |
- |
- |
1.3 XV Premium ₹12,64,990 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1.3 XV Premium(O) ₹13,69,990 |
HTX ₹13,09,000 |
SX ₹13,46,000 |
- |
- |
1.3 XV Premium(O) DT ₹13,89,990 |
GTK ₹13,79,000 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
GTX ₹15,29,000 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
GTX+ ₹16,29,000 |
- |
- |
Maruti Suzuki S-Cross petrol manual comes with 4 variants: Sigma, Delta, Zeta and Alpha.
- Maruti Suzuki S-Cross starts at Rs. 8.39 lakh. S-Cross Sigma is the most affordable car in the segment.
- Alpha is S-Crosss most expensive variant with the petrol manual powertrain. It is priced at Rs. 11.16 lakh and that makes it more affordable than the most expensive petrol manual C-segment SUV, Kia Seltos GTX+, by Rs. 5.14 lakh.
Also Read - Maruti Suzuki S Cross Specifications - Engine, Power, Transmission & Fuel Efficiency (Mileage)
C-SEGMENT SUV | PETROL AUTOMATIC | PRICE LIST EX-SHOWROOM INDIA | JUL 2020 |
|||
Maruti Suzuki S-Cross |
Nissan Kicks |
Kia Seltos |
Hyundai Creta |
Delta ₹10,83,500 |
- |
- |
- |
Zeta ₹11,18,500 |
- |
- |
- |
Alpha ₹12,39,000 |
1.3 XV ₹13,44,990 |
- |
- |
1.3 XV Premium ₹14,14,990 |
HTX ₹14,09,000 |
- |
|
- |
- |
SX ₹14,94,000 |
|
- |
- |
- |
SX(O) ₹16,15,000 |
- |
- |
GTX ₹16,29,000 |
1.4 Turbo SX ₹16,16,000 |
- |
- |
GTX+ ₹17,29,000 |
1.4 Turbo SX(O) ₹17,20,000 |
Maruti Suzuki S-Cross petrol automatic comes with 3 variants: Delta, Zeta and Alpha.
- Maruti Suzuki S-Cross starts at Rs. 10.84 lakh. S-Cross Delta is the most affordable automatic car in the segment.
- Alpha is S-Crosss most expensive variant with the petrol automatic powertrain. It is priced at Rs. 12.39 lakh and that makes it more affordable than the most expensive petrol automatic C-segment SUV, Kia Seltos GTX+, by Rs. 4.90 lakh.
Maruti Suzuki S-Cross 1.5 Petrol vs Rivals | Engine Comparison
C-SEGMENT SUV PETROL ENGINE SPECS |
||||||||
Maruti S-Cross |
Nissan Kicks |
Kia Seltos |
Hyundai Creta |
Renault Duster |
||||
Displacement |
1.5L Hybrid |
1.3 Turbo |
1.5L |
1.5 |
1.4L Turbo |
1.5 |
1.4L Turbo |
1.5 |
Cylinder |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
Cubic Capacity |
1462cc |
1330cc |
1498cc |
1497cc |
1353cc |
1497cc |
1353cc |
1498cc |
Maximum Power |
105PS @ 6000rpm |
156PS @ 5500rpm |
106PS @ 5600rpm |
115PS @ 6300rpm |
140PS @ 6000rpm |
115PS @ 6300rpm |
140PS @ 6000rpm |
106PS @ 5600rpm |
Peak Torque |
138Nm @ 4400rpm |
254Nm @ 1600rpm |
142Nm @ 4000rpm |
144Nm @ 4500rpm |
242Nm @ 1500 - 3200rpm |
144Nm @ 4500rpm |
242Nm @ 1500 - 3200rpm |
142Nm @ 4000rpm |
Manual Transmission |
5-speed |
6-speed |
5-speed |
6-speed |
6-speed |
6-speed |
- |
5-speed |
Manual FE |
18.55kmpl |
15.8kmpl |
13.9kmpl |
16.5kmpl |
16.1kmpl |
16.8kmpl |
- |
14.26kmpl |
Automatic Transmission |
4-speed TC |
CVT |
- |
CVT |
7-speed DCT |
CVT |
7-speed DCT |
- |
Automatic FE |
18.43kmpl |
15.8kmpl |
- |
16.8kmpl |
16.5kmpl |
16.9kmpl |
16.8kmpl |
- |
Maruti Suzuki S-Cross is available with a 1.5L hybrid petrol engine with a 5-speed and a 4-speed torque converter automatic transmission. The power and torque output of this engine are 105PS and 138Nm, respectively.
- Nissan Kicks produces 156PS of power. It is the most powerful engine in the segment, having 51PS more power than S-Cross 1.5.
- Nissan Kicks produces 254Nm of peak torque. It has the best torque figures in the segment.
- With the manual as well as automatic transmission, the Maruti Suzuki S Cross has the best mileage figure of 18.55kmpl and 18.43kmpl, respectively.
Nissan Kicks turbo petrol engine offers the best torque in this segment, so it will offer better driveability compared to all other cars. If youre looking for a car with low running cost, then Maruti Suzuki S-Cross will be better since it is the most fuel-efficient car in this segment.
Also Read - Maruti Suzuki S-Cross Ground Clearance, Boot Space, Dimensions and Tyre Size
The S-Cross’ drivability will be better than the Renault Duster, Kicks 1.5 and Kia Seltos 1.5 as its torque-to-weight ratio is better than that of these cars.
Maruti Suzuki S-Cross vs Rivals | Dimension Comparison
C-SEGMENT SUV DIMENSION COMPARISON |
|||||
Maruti Suzuki S-Cross |
Nissan Kicks |
Kia Seltos |
Hyundai Creta |
Renault Duster |
|
Length |
4300mm |
4384mm |
4315mm |
4300mm |
4360mm |
Width |
1785mm |
1813mm |
1800mm |
1790mm |
1822mm |
Height |
1595mm |
1669mm |
1645mm |
1635mm |
1695mm |
Wheelbase |
2600mm |
2673mm |
2610mm |
2610mm |
2673mm |
Boot Space |
353 - 375-lt |
400-lt |
433-lt |
433-lt |
475-lt |
Ground Clearance |
180mm |
210mm |
190mm |
190mm |
205mm |
Fuel Tank |
48-lt |
50-lt |
50-lt |
50-lt |
50-lt |
Tyre Size (Base) |
215/60 R16 |
215/60 R17 |
205/65 R16 |
205/65 R16 |
215/65 R16 |
Tyre Size (Top) |
215/60 R16 |
215/60 R17 |
215/60 R17 |
215/60 R17 |
215/65 R16 |
Maruti Suzuki S-Cross is 4300mm long, 1785mm wide, 1595mm tall and has a wheelbase of 2600mm. A wider body normally results in better shoulder room and a higher roof makes ingress & egress easier. A longer wheelbase usually results in more cabin space. It has a boot space of 375 litres. A larger boot allows you to carry more luggage. SCross has a 180mm ground clearance, it rides on 215/60 R16 tyres size and has 48 litres fuel tank capacity.
- Nissan Kicks is the longest car in the segment. It is 84mm longer than S-Cross.
- The S-Cross is the shortest car in this segment and on par with the Creta.
- Renault Duster is the widest car in the segment. It is 37mm wider than S-Cross.
- The S Cross is the narrowest car in this segment.
- Renault Duster is the tallest car in the segment. It is 100mm taller than S-Cross.
- Nissan Kicks has the longest wheelbase in the segment. Its wheelbase is longer than the S-Cross’s by 73mm.
- The SCross has the shortest wheelbase in the segment.
- Renault Duster has the biggest boot space in the segment. It has 100-lt more boot space than the S-Cross.
- The S-Cross’ boot is the smallest in the segment and stands at 375 litres with the rear seatback upright and at 353 litres in the reclined position.
- Nissan Kickss ground clearance of 210mm is the best in the segment.
- Although the S-Cross has the smallest fuel tank in this comparison, it will have the longest driving range per full tank of petrol. The theoretical range of the Maruti SCross petrol is 888km.
Amongst all the C-segment SUVs, Nissan Kicks has the best ground clearance, so it is the best car to drive on uneven roads. While the S-Cross doesn’t impress with its dimensions or engine performance, they’re satisfactory and even great considering its lower price tag.
Renault Duster has the biggest boot in the segment, so it can carry maximum luggage. Despite its age, the Duster comes across as a competent car, at least in terms of dimensions. It can still hold its own against the rivals with its widest body, longest wheelbase and the biggest boot space. Its normal petrol engine also has respectable torque output compared to the similar engines among C segment SUVs - same as the Kicks.
Also Read - Exclusive Leak: Maruti Suzuki S-Cross Petrol Variants Explained
All things considered, the Duster may not deter a Seltos or Creta buyer with its old styling. However, it comes across as a potent rival for the S-Cross as it has a competent engine, better ground clearance, phenomenal road presence and a bigger cabin and boot. The Duster is worth a look if you’re not too bothered by its poor fuel efficiency, which is the worst in this segment.
0 Comments