2020 Volkswagen Polo vs Honda WR-V - Price, Specs, Features, Mileage Comparison
Which car is better: Volkswagen Polo or Honda WR-V? We compare prices, dimensions, engine specs, mileage and performance to help you decide which car better fulfils your requirements.

Polo 2020 vs WR-V 2020 | Price Comparison - Which One Is Cheaper?
POLO VS WR-V | PRICE COMPARISON EX-SHOWROOM, DELHI |
|||
PETROL MANUAL |
|||
Volkswagen Polo |
Honda WR-V |
||
Variants |
Price (in lakh) |
Variants |
Price (in lakh) |
Trendline |
₹5.83 |
SV |
₹8.50 |
Comfortline Plus |
₹6.77 |
VX |
₹9.70 |
Highline Plus TSI |
₹8.02 |
- |
- |
Volkswagen Polo prices start from Rs. 5.83 lakh and go up to Rs. 8.02 lakh for turbo petrol manual powertrain. The Honda WR-V petrol manual prices start from Rs. 8.50 lakh and go up to Rs. 9.70 lakh.
POLO VS WR-V | PRICE COMPARISON EX-SHOWROOM, DELHI |
|||
PETROL AUTOMATIC |
|||
Volkswagen Polo |
Honda WR-V |
||
Variants |
Price (in lakh) |
Variants |
Price (in lakh) |
Highline Plus TSI |
₹9.13 |
- |
- |
For the petrol automatic powertrain, Volkswagen Polo prices start from Rs. 9.13 lakh. Volkswagen Polo petrol automatic is Rs. 1.1 lakh more expensive than the manual. Honda WR-V is not available with petrol automatic powertrain.
Polo 2020 vs WR-V 2020 | Dimension Comparison - Which One Is Bigger?
Volkswagen Polo is 3971mm long, 1682mm wide and 1469mm tall and has a wheelbase of 2469mm. The Volkswagen Polo has a boot space of 280 litres. The Honda WR-V measures 3999mm in length, 1734mm in width and 1601mm in height. The wheelbase of Honda WR-V is 2555mm and it has a boot space of 363 litres.
Also Read - 2020 Volkswagen Polo vs Ford Aspire - Price, Specs, Features, Mileage Comparison
POLO VS WR-V | DIMENSION COMPARISON |
|||
Dimensions |
Volkswagen Polo |
Difference |
Honda WR-V |
Length (mm) |
3971 |
28 |
3999 |
Width (mm) |
1682 |
52 |
1734 |
Height (mm) |
1469 |
132 |
1601 |
Wheelbase (mm) |
2469 |
86 |
2555 |
Boot Space (litre) |
280 |
83 |
363 |
Ground Clearance(mm) |
165 |
23 |
188 |
Fuel Tank (litre) |
45 |
5 |
40 |
Tyre Size (Base Variant) |
175/70 R14 |
- |
195/60 R16 |
Tyre Size (Top Variant) |
195/55 R16 |
- |
195/60 R16 |
Dimension Review
- The WR-V is longer than the Polo by 28mm.
- The WR-V is wider than the Polo by 52mm.
- The WR-V is taller than the Polo by 132mm.
- The WR-V has a longer wheelbase than the Polo; by 86mm.
- The WR-V has 83 litres more boot space than the Polo.
- The WR-V has 23mm more ground clearance than the Polo.
- In terms of dimensions, the WR-V is a larger car than the Polo. So, it will have a better road presence than the Polo.
Polo 2020 vs WR-V 2020 | Engine Specs Comparison - Which One has Better Performance?
POLO VS WR-V | ENGINE COMPARISON |
|||
PETROL ENGINE |
|||
Volkswagen Polo |
Honda WR-V |
||
Engine |
1.0 L Turbo Petrol |
1.0 L Petrol |
1.2 L Petrol |
Displacement |
999 cc |
999 cc |
1199 cc |
Cylinder |
3 |
3 |
4 |
Maximum Power |
110PS @ 5000rpm |
76PS @ 6200rpm |
90PS @ 6000rpm |
Peak Torque |
175Nm @ 1750 - 4000rpm |
95Nm @ 2950 - 3800rpm |
110Nm @ 4800rpm |
Manual Transmission |
6-speed |
5-speed |
5-speed |
Manual FE |
18.24kmpl |
17.75kmpl |
16.5kmpl |
Automatic Transmission |
6-speed TC |
- |
- |
Automatic FE |
18.24kmpl |
- |
- |
Polo Turbo Petrol vs WR-V Petrol
Volkswagen Polo 1.0 L, 3-cylinder turbo petrol engine makes 110PS of maximum power and 175Nm of peak torque. It is available with a 6-speed manual and a 6-speed torque converter type automatic transmission. The Volkswagen Polo turbo petrol has a mileage of 18.24kmpl.
Also Read - Ford Figo vs Volkswagen Polo - Price, Specs, Features, Mileage Comparison
The Polo also gets a 1.0 L 3-cylinder petrol engine that makes 76PS of maximum power and 95Nm of peak torque. This engine is available with a 5-speed manual transmission and has a fuel efficiency of 17.75kmpl.
Honda WR-V 1.2 L, 4-cylinder petrol engine makes 90PS of maximum power and 110Nm of peak torque. It is available with a 5-speed manual transmission and has a mileage of 16.5kmpl.
Petrol Engine Review
- The WR-V makes more power than the Polo non-turbo but it’s less powerful than the Polo turbo.
- The WR-V petrol makes less torque than the Polo turbo but it produces more torque than the Polo non-turbo.
- The Polo petrol is more fuel-efficient than the WR-V.
- The Polo non-turbo and WRV petrol are some of the worst cars for drivability as they both offer a torque-to-weight ratio of below 100Nm/tonne. While the WR-V has a higher figure than the Polo non-turbo, it’s peak torque arrives at higher RPMs. Therefore, expect similar drivability from both of these cars.
- The Polo turbo, on the other hand, has a phenomenal torque output and torque-to-weight ratio. If you want an engine that’s as easy to drive on the highways as in the city, then this is an easy recommendation.
Polo 2020 vs WR-V 2020 | Top Feature Comparison
Notable top features of Polo 2020 are:
- Dual beam headlamps w/ cornering lights
- Auto dimming IRVM
- 16-inch alloy wheels
- 7-inch touchscreen w/ Android Auto & Apple CarPlay
- Cruise control
- Rear AC vents
- Leather wrapped steering & gear-shift knob
- Auto AC
- Auto rain sensing wipers
- Electrically foldable ORVMs
- Steering mounted controls
Notable top features of WR-V 2020 are:
- LED projector headlamps w/ LED DRL
- Electric sunroof
- 16-inch alloy wheels
- 7-inch touchscreen infotainment system w/ Navigation, Android Auto & Apple CarPlay
- Auto AC w/ touchscreen control panel
- Front center armrest w/ storage
- Multi-view rear view camera
- Leather steering
- Keyless entry w/ push start/stop button
- Tilt & telescopic steering
- Height adjustable driver seat
0 Comments