Renault Kwid vs Maruti Suzuki Celerio - Price, Specs, Features, Mileage Comparison

Renault Kwid vs Maruti Suzuki Celerio - Price, Specs, Features, Mileage Comparison

Which A-segment hatchback is better: Renault Kwid or Maruti Suzuki Celerio? We compare prices, dimensions, engine specs, mileage and performance to help you decide which car better fulfils your requirements.

Renault Kwid vs Maruti Suzuki Celerio

Kwid 2021 vs Celerio 2021 | Price Comparison - Which One Is Cheaper?

KWID VS CELERIO | PRICE COMPARISON

EX-SHOWROOM, DELHI

PETROL MANUAL

Renault Kwid

Maruti Suzuki Celerio

Variants

Price (in lakh)

Variants

Price (in lakh)

RXE 0.8

Rs. 4.12

LXI

Rs. 4.99

RXL 0.8

Rs. 4.42

VXI

Rs. 5.63

RXT 0.8

Rs. 4.72

ZXI

Rs. 5.94

RXL 1.0

Rs. 4.58

ZXI Plus

Rs. 6.44

RXT (O) 1.0

Rs. 4.95



Climber (O) 1.0

Rs. 5.16



Renault Kwid prices start from Rs. 4.12 lakh and go up to Rs. 5.16 lakh for petrol manual powertrain. The Maruti Suzuki Celerio petrol manual prices start from Rs. 4.99 lakh and go up to Rs. 6.44 lakh.


KWID VS CELERIO | PRICE COMPARISON

EX-SHOWROOM, DELHI

PETROL AUTOMATIC

Renault Kwid

Maruti Suzuki Celerio

Variants

Price (in lakh)

Variants

Price (in lakh)

RXL 1.0

Rs. 4.98

VXI

Rs. 6.13

RXT (O) 1.0

Rs. 5.35

ZXI

Rs. 6.44

Climber (O) 1.0

Rs. 5.56

ZXI Plus

Rs. 6.94

For the petrol automatic powertrain, Renault Kwid prices start from Rs. 4.98 lakh. Renault Kwid petrol automatic is Rs. 40,000 more expensive than the manual. Maruti Suzuki Celerio starts at Rs. 6.13 lakh. Maruti Suzuki Celerio petrol automatic is Rs. 50,000 more expensive than the manual.

Kwid 2021 vs Celerio 2021 | Dimension Comparison - Which One Is Bigger?

Renault Kwid is 3731mm long, 1579mm wide and 1474mm tall and has a wheelbase of 2422mm. The Renault Kwid has a boot space of 279 litres. The Maruti Suzuki Celerio measures 3695mm in length, 1655mm in width and 1555mm in height. The wheelbase of the Maruti Suzuki Celerio is 2435mm and it has a boot space of 313 litres.

Also Read - Maruti Suzuki WagonR vs Maruti Suzuki Celerio - Price, Specs, Features, Mileage Comparison

KWID VS CELERIO | DIMENSION COMPARISON

Dimensions

Renault Kwid

Difference

Maruti Suzuki Celerio

Length (mm)

3731

36

3695

Width (mm)

1579

76

1655

Height (mm)

1474

81

1555

Wheelbase (mm)

2422

13

2435

Boot Space (litre)

279

34

313

Ground Clearance(mm)

184

14

170

Fuel Tank (litre)

28

4

32

Tyre Size (Base Variant)

165/70 R14

-

165/70 R14

Tyre Size (Top Variant)

165/70 R14

-

175/60 R15

Dimension Review

  • The Kwid is longer than the Celerio by 36mm.

  • The Celerio is wider than the Kwid by 76mm.

  • The Celerio is taller than the Kwid by 81mm.

  • The Celerio has a longer wheelbase than the Kwid; by 13mm.

  • The Celerio has 34 litres more boot space than the Kwid.

  • The Kwid has 14mm more ground clearance than the Celerio.

  • In terms of dimensions, the Celerio is a larger car than the Kwid. So, it will have a better road presence than the Kwid.

Kwid 2021 vs Celerio 2021 | Engine Specs Comparison - Which One has Better Performance?


KWID VS CELERIO | ENGINE COMPARISON

PETROL ENGINE


Renault Kwid

Maruti Suzuki Celerio

Engine

1.0L Petrol

0.8L Petrol

1.0L Petrol

Displacement

999 cc

799 cc

998 cc

Cylinder

3

3

3

Maximum Power

68PS @ 5500rpm

54PS @ 5600rpm

67PS @ 5500rpm

Peak Torque

91Nm @ 4250rpm

72Nm @ 4250rpm

89Nm @ 3500rpm

Manual Transmission

5-speed

5-speed

5-speed

Manual FE

21.7kmpl

20.71kmpl

24.97 - 25.23kmpl

Automatic Transmission

5-speed AMT

-

5-speed AMT

Automatic FE

22.0kmpl

-

26.0 - 26.68kmpl

Kwid Petrol vs Celerio Petrol

Renault Kwid 1.0L, 3-cylinder petrol engine makes 68PS of maximum power and 91Nm of peak torque. It is available with a 5-speed manual and a 5-speed AMT type automatic transmission. The Renault Kwid petrol manual has a mileage of 21.7kmpl while the automatic claims to deliver a fuel efficiency figure of 22kmpl.

Also Read - Maruti Suzuki Celerio vs Maruti Suzuki Swift - Price, Specs, Features, Mileage Comparison

The Kwid also gets a 0.8L, 3-cylinder petrol engine that makes 54PS of maximum power and 72Nm of peak torque. It is available with a 5-speed manual transmission and returns a fuel-efficiency of 20.71kmpl.

Maruti Suzuki Celerio 1.0L, 3-cylinder petrol engine makes 67PS of maximum power and 89Nm of peak torque. It is available with a 5-speed manual and a 5-speed AMT type automatic transmission. The Maruti Suzuki Celerio petrol manual has a mileage of 24.97 - 25.23kmpl while the automatic claims to deliver a fuel efficiency figure of 26.0 - 26.68kmpl.

Petrol Engine Review

  • The Kwid has a more powerful petrol engine than the Celerio.

  • The Kwid's petrol engine produces more torque than the Celerio's.

  • The Celerio 1.0L petrol is more fuel-efficient than the Kwid.

  • The Kwid's petrol engine has a better torque-to-weight ratio than the Celerio. So, it will offer better driveability compared to the Celerio.

Kwid 2021 vs Celerio 2021 | Top Feature Comparison

Notable top features of Kwid 2021 are:

  • LED DRL

  • Front & Rear Power Windows

  • Full Wheel Covers

  • 8-inch Touchscreen w/ AUX, USB, Bluetooth & Apple CarPlay & Android Auto Connectivity

  • LED Digital Instrument Cluster

  • Dual Front Airbags

  • Reverse Parking Camera w/ Guidelines

  • Reverse Parking Sensors

  • Remote Keyless Entry

  • Rear Parcel Tray

  • Accessory Socket

Also Read - Maruti Suzuki Celerio vs Tata Punch - Price, Specs, Features, Mileage Comparison

Notable top features of Celerio 2021 are:

  • Push button start

  • Front Fog lamps

  • 15-inch black alloy wheels

  • 7-inch touchscreen w/ Android Auto & Apple CarPlay

  • Remote keyless entry

  • Engine Start/Stop

  • Front & Rear Power Windows

  • Steering mounted controls

  • Electrically adjustable & foldable ORVMs w/ turn indicators

  • Rear defogger

  • Rear wiper & washer

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Mahesh Yadav

Mahesh is a fan of compact, quirky and underrated vehicles that punch above their weight. Multix, Nano, Strom R3 and Navi are his favorites.

0 Comments

Leave a Reply